Which Is A False Statement About The Requirements Of Interobserver Agreement (Ioa)

Another method of reliability is used when there is a partial interval or a full interval. The partial interval refers to the interval score if the behavior occurs at any point in that interval. The full interval refers to the assessment of the interval when the behaviour occurs throughout the interval. Therefore, there is no „counting“ of behaviour; the interval is simply considered a „deposit“ or a „non-deposit.“ In the case of interval recording, reliability can be calculated by characterizing each interval as either agreeing (both observers recorded behavior or no behavior) or disagreement (one observer recorded the behavior, while the other did not). The total number of agreements for the meeting is then divided by agreements plus disagreements and multiplied by 100 to obtain the average reliability for the entire observation. An important caveat with regard to the integrity of the treatment is that different procedures require different levels of correct implementation. For example, an occasional error in a extinction procedure is an intermittent reinforcement plan. Suppose a parent correctly implements extinction for 95% of child night episodes. This means that the behavior on a variable ratio (VR) 20 is reinforced, which could maintain the behavior of the problem. Therefore, an integrity assessment that appears „high“ and sounds very bad depending on the procedure. Alternatively, some procedures may not require a high degree of integrity to succeed.

For example, an occasional error in the case of differential amplification of the alternative behavior plan (DRA) cannot be detrimental if the alternative (desirable) behavior is more amplifying than the problematic behavior. Suppose a parent strengthens tantrums according to a VR 4 schedule (75% integrity if the prescribed intervention is not a reinforcement of tantrum), but reinforces appropriate requests for attention on a VR 2 schedule (50% integrity if the prescribed intervention is a reinforcement to meet all the corresponding requests). Since the timing is much richer for appropriate behaviours, we can predict, based on decades of research on electoral behaviour, that the child would attribute almost all of his or her behaviour to the corresponding behaviours.